Psychiatric Drug Facts via breggin.com :

“Most psychiatric drugs can cause withdrawal reactions, sometimes including life-threatening emotional and physical withdrawal problems… Withdrawal from psychiatric drugs should be done carefully under experienced clinical supervision.” Dr. Peter Breggin
Showing posts with label Saturday Survivors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Saturday Survivors. Show all posts

Jun 22, 2012

Saturday Survivors: Joshua



This is a the first of what I hope will be many times I feature the Human Rights advocacy of members of

My first "Saturday Survivor" is from Ireland.  Not a psychiatric survivor in the traditional or usual sense, but a survivor of psychiatric harm nonetheless. Suffer the little children...
This is Joshua, he lives in Cork, Ireland with his sister, Hazel and his mum, Grainnie.

Joshua's dad is confined at a hospital.  John Hunt has been held at Carraig Mor for Josh's entire life.  
In the video below you can see Josh and his sister, Hazel at a MindFreedom Ireland event. 
Learn more about "Free John Hunt" here.
MindFreedom Ireland
is
Having a Revolution.
A Love Revolution for the Human Rights of People with a Psychiatric Diagnosis 
The "Alchemy in the Wards" video shows many of  members of MindFreedom Ireland 
Lyrics: by Grainne Humphys   Music: by Mary Maddock


My friend Chloe is seven and she likes this song; only she won't say the naughty word  when she sings it!  She just smiles...So don't get me in trouble kiddo...A song for Joshua:



first published 3-12-2011 

Sep 10, 2011

Saturday Survivors: Ted Chabasinski

"Those who profess to favor freedom yet deprecate agitation, 
are people who want crops without plowing up the ground. 
Power concedes nothing without a struggle. 
It never has and it never will." 
Frederick Douglass 

Today's Saturday Survivor is long time Civil Rights activist and MindFreedom International member, Ted Chabasinski. Ted's incredible story of psychiatric trauma inflicted upon him in psychiatric facilities for most of his childhood, and his recovery are a triumphant testimony of his innate indomitable spirit.
via Mind Freedom International

Ted Chabasinski

"When Miss Callaghan had discovered enough "symptoms," I was sent to the Bellevue children's psychiatric ward, to be officially diagnosed and to made an experimental animal for Doctor Bender. I was one of the first children to be "treated" with electric shock. I was six years old."
Born: 20 March 1937

Contact info: Berkeley, California, USA


Currently doing: Ted is working as the directing attorney for Mental Health Consumer Concerns (MHCC).


Mental health experience: Shocked, Inpatient, Outpatient, Forced Treatment, Raped, Restraints, Tortured, Solitary Confinement


Psychiatric labels: Schizophrenia


Recovery methods: Peer Support, Self-Help, Social Activism, One-on-one Therapy, Group Therapy, Diet, Exercise, Art/Music, Family/Friends


Brief History:
Psychiatrists and social workers had already decided before I was born that I was going to be a mental patient. My natural mother had been locked up just before she gave birth to me and was locked up again soon after. The social worker from the Foundling Hospital told my foster parents that my mother was "peculiar," and Miss Callaghan soon had them looking for symptoms in me, too. Every month Miss Callaghan would come and discuss my "problems" with my foster parents. If I only wanted to stay in the back yard with my sister and make mud pies, this was a sign that I was too passive and withdrawn, and my mommy and daddy were supposed to encourage me to explore the neighborhood more. When I started to wander around the neighborhood, I went to a neighbor's garden and picked some flowers. The neighbor complained, and Miss Callaghan held a long session with my parents about curbing my "hostile" impulses. read here.

Ted has been active in the psychiatric survivor movement for decades. In the summer of 1970, there was a gathering of psychiatric survivors at the Highlander Center in Tennessee. Ted and the other survivors who gathered forty one years ago are the leaders in the Civil Rights Movement for people with psychiatric diagnoses in the United States. See: "Nothing About Us Without Us History" page above for more.


The general public is largely unaware of the history of the psychiatric survivor movement. Even worse is the fact that the public has been misinformed about the efforts of Ted Chabasinski and other survivors to obtain basic Human Rights for people who have a psychiatric diagnois. Ted Chabasinski and other survivors in the psychiatric survivor Civil Rights movement have been diligently pursuing basic Human Rights for decades. This Civil Rights movement is following the examples of Eleanor Roosevelt, and Martin Luther King Jr., among others. Ted and other survivors have been seeking basic Human Rights for themselves and for all people who are denied equal rights under the law, due to a psychiatric diagnosis. Our Founding Fathers declared that human equality is "self-evident" in the Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

The rights of all individuals were effectively and adequately defined and secured by the framers of The Constitution of the United States; yet these rights are denied people who have a psychiatric diagnosis as a matter of course; as they have been denied to other people based on heritage or gender historically in this Nation. 235 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Ted Chabasinski, a member of Mind Freedom International, is advocating for Individual Rights that the Constitution of the United States of America declared belong to all American equally. Rights are not effectively secured if they are not protected and defended, these are Human Rights, and are applicable to all Americans equally. September 17th of 2011 it will have been 224 years since this document was sent to individual States to be ratified. Isn't it time that the Law of the Land is applied equally to all Americans?

Ted survived horrific treatment as a child and adolescent, and has spent much of his adult life helping others by sharing his experience and demonstrating his devotion to the principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. Ted knows these principles are applicable to every one of us, and he knows the harm that happens to people when their Individual Rights are not protected or defended.

Ted became an attorney to more effectively help psychiatric survivors; his advocacy benefits all of us, it is a service to humanity.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
Martin Luther King, Jr.

Ted Chabasinski on Wikipedia

Mar 26, 2011

Saturday Survivors: Isaac



My son, Isaac is this week's Saturday Survivor, because he once was a Ward of the State who was used in Drug Trials without Informed Consent. At the time, no one but his MadMother seemed to think anything was wrong with that...


Today's post is dedicated to children in state care who are given drugs for their symptoms of distress. Some of these children are now disabled like my son; and some are dead, like Domico Presnell and R.B.  All of them are considered potential liabilities to the State who has a duty to protect them. The State neglects children in the interest of greed, pseudo-scientific research, and pseudo-medicine.  Children in State care are a liability when they are injured in state care, injuries and death are evidence that child protection services are not protective of children and youths who are considerd liabilities...


Wards of the State, sometimes referred to as Wards of the Court, are what foster children are in legal terms.  A State is a legal entity; foster care is a business conducted by the State.  When children are harmed due to negligence, abuse and/or dereliction of duty on the part of State employees, it is in legal terms, a "liability" that the State protects itself from.  Even when it means not investigating crimes in victimizing these children, committing more crimes to cover up crimes, and causing further harm.


Allowing psychiatric drugs to be prescribed at all to children is questionable given the rampant academic, research, and pharmaceutical industry fraud. Prescribing psychiatric drugs to children with what is now known about the effects of every class of psychiatric drug, which psychiatric researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry have lied about the results of the drug trials conducted, lied about the nature of the diagnoses themselves, and worst of all covered up the disability and deaths the drugs cause.  Obviously compounding the problem is the utter failure of the FDA to protect the American people with due diligence.  The FDA appears to have been colluding with unethical psychiatric researchers and pharma executives to lie to the American people.  Research psychiatrists and pharma representatives who lobby both the FDA and elected public servants to influence in how this "regulatory agency" functions.  The NIMH fails to avoid major Conflicts of Interest in how business is conducted on behalf of the American people as well---chiefly by continuing to fund clinical drug trials which serve no valid scientific purpose, these drug trials are conducted to expand the market for psychiatric drugs, which is not a valid medical purpose, and is not at all ethical!  NIMH rarely funds research into any causes of psychiatric conditions, or treatments for them which may diminish the dependence on psychiatric drugs to treat the symptoms, or to shrink the drug market.


I'm going to just say it: Thomas Insell, the Director of NIMH is an idiot who lacks the ethics and integrity to be a medical professional.  His record of subterfuge, most notably vouching for Charles Nemeroff, a psychiatric researcher who should be in prison for the crimes he has committed,  Instead Insell helped him get another research position at another institution of Higher Learning!  The Director of NIMH lacks credibility; he does not have the integrity required to lead this Nation's leading Research Agency into the causes and treatments for Mental Illnesses.  Research which is carried out needs to be conducted ethically, and conducted to, "FIRST, DO NO HARM..."  Insell does not value these qualities, thus he does not expect grant recipients to value them either; and obviously, he can not hold grant recipients to them either.

The current practice at the NIMH is to fund reseach which serves to increase the number of people who are labeled with a condition that requires "medical treatment" with psychiatric drugs.  Groups targeted include: children in foster care, the elderly in long term care facilities, and traumatized veterans.  Drugs which are prescribed for symptoms---drugs which can and do cause disability and death, drugs which whether they work or are perceived by the individual taking them to be helpful, can cause dependence, disability, and death; all of these drugs are marketed as "safe and effective," and non-addictive, in spite of these claims being not just misleading, but in some cases--outright falsehoods.

IT IS IN EFFECT
 IT IS IN FACT 
IT IS IN REALITY 


STATE SANCTIONED CHILD ABUSE

To give a foster child drugs which are NOT safe, NOT effective and NOT FDA approved, it is Human Experimentation, it is a violation of their Human Rights, it is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath and the Nuremberg Code.

It is a State Sanctioned Crime Against Humanity.

My son is going to be 23 tomorrow. He was given drugs instead of the treatment he needed, for severe PTSD after he was victimized by violent crime in a State of Washington foster home.  Ultimately, he was used in NIMH-funded drug trials, conducted in a State run psychiatric facility without Informed Consent; which is  against both State and Federal Law.  I was told I had no say by psychiatric researcher, Jon McClellan, who is the Medical Director at this facility to this day; and  a professor at the University of Washington.  Despite my protests, and the fact that my son's supposed "assent" was in fact coerced.  My child was told that if he did not take the drugs, he would never get to leave and go home!  This is how a "lead psychiatric researcher" bullies disturbed children; Quack Master Jack looked me in the eye and told me I had no say in what he was doing to my boy.  I knew then, and I know now:  He is a liar and he is someone who should never be allowed to be alone  with a vulnerable child.  Quack Master Jack belongs in prison.

Even when I was able to finally rescue my son the psychiatrists at both of the Community Mental Health Agencies refused to have a reasonable conversation about the adverse effects of the drugs and the iatrogenic harm being inflicted on my son, none would even consider lowering the dose.  NO choice, NO voice, No Consent, No Ethics, No matter the Cognitive Decline; No matter what.

My son's care and the drugs are paid for by Medicaid.  It is and has been Medicaid Law for over two decades that all mental health treatment paid for by Medicaid is to be directed by the person receiving it; in the case of a child, directed by their parent, or guardian.  At the time, when my son was at Child Study and Treatment Center, even Wards of the State were to have a parent's consent for psychiatric treatment, if they were under thirteen; and when over thirteen if they lacked capacity.  My son could not hold a conversation for longer than a couple of minutes---there is no way in hell a meaningful conversation about risks and benefits of any kind was possible!  It was in fact the policy of the State of Washington that no State employee had the authority to authorize the administration of psychotropic drugs to Wards of the State, it was considered a liability, Jon McClellan, Quack Master Jack, is a State employee, and he was the only one authorizing the administration of drugs to my child;  I will assume the other children who were state wards as well.

It was shortly after I brought my son home in 2005 that the State of Washington developed a psychotropic drug policy for children in State custody--not surprisingly, it protects the State, and not the children to whom it applies.  Children in State custody when a parent is not available are supposed to have a special advocate appointed, for obvious reasons... For the drugs and the mental health services to be reimbursable by the Federal Medicaid Program; my son and I are to be DIRECTING his care.  It has been Federal Law for well over two DECADES and yet----WE are given NO CHOICE and allowed NO VOICE long ago and to this very day.  I can't help but worry about who is watching out for the children in state care who don't have family to take them home, and don't have a MadMother...


Children in State foster care need of care and protection.  
All adults who are awake and have a conscience have a duty to children in State Custody.  

Foster children count on of ALL of  US.
The state is a poor parent and has little to no accountability.


Mar 19, 2011

Saturday Survivors: Cindi Fisher


Barbara Kingsolver 


I am MadProud of this week's Saturday Survivor, MindFreedom International member, Cindi Fisher.  Cindi is an mental health activist living in Vancouver, Washington.  She is the mother and passionate advocate for her son, Siddharta; who has a diagnosis of schizophrenia.  Cindi, who has both general and medical power of attorney for her son, had her authority questioned, when advocating  for Sid at Western State Hospital in Lakewood, Washington when he was under an involuntary commitment order.  The State of Washington is now threatening to appoint a Guardian other than Cindi, his mother.  This decision would be contrary to Sid's wishes outlined in his legally executed Power of Attorney.    


There is something seriously wrong when State authorities or agents step in; in effect, act in loco parentis for minors or as guardians for adults when there are parents, or others chosen, who are willing and capable of doing so.   Cindi was designated by her son as his first choice should it become necessary for a Guardian to be appointed for him.   In the case of minors in the State of Washington, it is the Law itself that grants parents the authority to make mental health decisions for their minor children, in my experience, this is ignored by psychiatrists and other mental health professionals.  Can it be that Family Rights are not important to Washington State?   
from Cindi's Website:



Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Hello, My name is Cindi Fisher and I am co-founder of this website and organization. Today just after midnight, beginning September 1, 2010 on Wednesday, I began my fast for Mental Health Rights.  The most immediate catalyst for this fast was/is my 33 year old son, Siddharta Fisher.

The MOMS Movement is: 

The Movement of Mothers and others StandingUp Together
Why are Mothers and Others StandingUp?
Inspired by an ancient African proverb, 
WE ARE:


RAISING the VILLAGE 
and
 taking back Our Children

(from the mental institutions, from the jails and prisons, from 
drugs, from sexual slavery, from the streets, from the state)


Cindi and I have a lot in common and I am in awe of her.  I am inspired by what she does and how much she has accomplished.


Please check out her website and consider what you can do as a Mother or Other, for MOMS.  Cindi did not abdicate her parental rights when her son was a minor, and should not have to worry that Washington State will wrest away her ability to continue to act on her son's behalf, as long as Sid wants her to, and she is willing and able to do so. 


When our children were minors, our rights as parents to make decisions for their benefit, are protected by the Constitution of the United States.  For a parent, it is horrifying to know that because of a psychiatric label, a beloved child, is at risk because of the illness itself.  It is an added burden to know it also means that your child will NOT have his individual rights to Procedural Due Process of Law protected or defended, nor will effective assistance of counsel provided when facing Involuntary Commitment.  Violations are not even investigated if reported. Simply because of a diagnosis of mental illness; one can lose the right to choose whether or not to take drugs or have ECT.  Diagnosis for psychitric conditions are based solely on subjective opinion, not based on any medical certainty.  Involuntary Commitment Laws DO NOT protect the Constitutional Rights of our vulnerable mentally ill!   


MOMS is against court-ordered drugging and court-ordered ECT!  
Forced treatment is a violation of Human Rights! 

Take a Stand 
StandUp with MOMS 
Mental Health Rights
YES!!


Although we may not know it, we have, in our day, 
witnessed the birth of the Therapeutic State. 
This is perhaps the major implication of psychiatry as an institution of social control.
--Thomas S. Szasz, Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry:
An Inquiry Into the Social Uses of Mental Health Practices,
The Macmillan Company, New York, 1963

Motherhood is priced of God at price no man may dare to lessen or misunderstand.
Helen Fiske Hunt Jackson


LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted
(C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.