Psychiatric Drug Facts via breggin.com :

“Most psychiatric drugs can cause withdrawal reactions, sometimes including life-threatening emotional and physical withdrawal problems… Withdrawal from psychiatric drugs should be done carefully under experienced clinical supervision.” Dr. Peter Breggin
Showing posts with label New York State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York State. Show all posts

Feb 28, 2013

ADVOCATES STAND TO SAY YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT ME, STOP PSYCHIATRIC PROFILING!



Stop Psychiatric Profiling Action
from (de)VOICED on Vimeo.
Stop Psychiatric Profiling Trailer 1
from (de)VOICED on Vimeo.


Stop Psychiatric Profiling Epic
from (de)VOICED on Vimeo.


Stop Psychiatric Profiling NOIR
from (de)VOICED on Vimeo.

ADVOCATES STAND TO SAY YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT ME,
STOP PSYCHIATRIC PROFILING!
People from across New York State who have been given a psychiatric diagnosis Stand in Protest of funding for legislation that violates human rights at the Joint Legislative Public Hearing on 2013-2014 Executive Budget Proposal: Topic "Mental Hygiene".
PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release
CONTACT: AMY COLESANTE, (518) 813-3156
WHAT: PRESS CONFERENCE and ACTION
WHERE: Legislative Office Building 181 State Street, outside of Hearing Room B Albany, NY 12247
DATE: February 27, 2013
PRESS CONFERENCE TIME: 12:30 PM (at close of Hearing)
PHOTO OP TIME: From 9:30 AM thru the close of the Public Hearings, (12:30 PM)
WEBSITE FOR PUBLIC: mhepinc.org
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, people who have been given a psychiatric diagnosis will be taking a stand against New York State Legislation that tracks and criminalizes them. These advocates will be wearing T-Shirts that say on the front, “You are talking about me” and on the back, “Stop psychiatric profiling” in protest of legislation such as the New York Safe Act; public health law Section 384b of the Social Services Law that removes children from their parents simply because they have been given a psychiatric diagnosis; and the expansion and extension of the highly controversial Kendra’s Law.
Amy Colesante, Executive Director of Mental Health Empowerment Project, a statewide advocacy organization that is run for and by people with first hand, lived experience in the psychiatric system, states “Today, we Stand to let the New York Legislature know it is not acceptable to spend tax-payer dollars to promote and fund multiple acts of legislation which violate the civil, human, and constitutional rights of people who have been given a psychiatric diagnosis.” (emphasis mine)
The latest discriminatory action taken by the NYS government involves the creation of a central data base designed to track people with a psychiatric diagnosis. Maura Kelley, Director of Mental Health Peer Connection, a consumer run program in Buffalo, New York states “Research findings can no longer be ignored. It is commonly cited that people with a psychiatric history are 14 times more likely to be a victims of crime than arrested for one (Brekke, 2001). In the United States and abroad, people are calling for action to stop psychiatric profiling (Walsh, et, al 2003). These efforts to scapegoat us are simply a veil of safety.”
Stopping psychiatric profiling is a movement to eliminate the scapegoating of people who have been given a psychiatric diagnosis by politicians, media, gun control advocates and the pro-gun lobbyists. Ellen Healion, Executive Director of Hands Across Long Island, a consumer-run agency in Long Island, states “people with a psychiatric label pose as much risk to the general public as everyone sitting on the floor of the Assembly or Senate. The bottom line is the fact that even considering a data base attacks civil liberties and rights. That this issue is even being discussed, whether publicly or behind closed doors is an atrocity.”

Aug 24, 2012

Lauren Tenney's Testimony at New York State's Olmstead Hearing

STOPFORCEDTX2.jpg
"When ever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither is safe."
Edmund Burke
via lauren10e


Published on Aug 24, 2012 by lauren10e

Lauren Tenney testifies at Olmstead hearing 8.22.2012 and makes calls that state-sponsored murder, slavery, and torture must end.

For more information: www.facebook.com/TenneyLauren
www.TheOpalProject.org  www.StopForceNow.org  www.NoIOC.org

Supreme Court Upholds ADA 'Integration Mandate' in Olmstead decision
Washington, DC, June 22, 1999 -- In rejecting the state of Georgia's appeal to enforce institutionalization of individuals with disabilities, the Supreme Court today affirmed the right of individuals with disabilities to live in their community in its 6-3 ruling against the state of Georgia in the case Olmstead v. L.C and E.W.

Under Title II of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, delivering the opinion of the court, "states are required to place persons with mental disabilities in community settings rather than in institutions when the StateÕs treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities. "
The 'integration mandate' of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires public agencies to provide services "in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities." The high court upheld that mandate, ruling that Georgia's department of human resources could not segregate two women with mental disabilities in a state psychiatric hospital long after the agency's own treatment professionals had recommended their transfer to community care.
The lower courts ruled the state violated the ADA's "integration mandate" and Georgia appealed, claiming the ruling could lead to the closing of all state hospitals and disruption of state funding of services to people with mental disabilities.

However, the women were supported by a number of states, disability organizations and others, including the U.S. solicitor general, who said "The unjustified segregation of people in institutions, when community placement is appropriate, constitutes a form of discrimination prohibited by Title II [of the ADA]."

Originally, 26 states had signed onto an Amicus Brief in support of Georgia's position. However, an extensive education campaign by the disability rights movement reduced that number to just seven. read more here
Isaac August 2011 

INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT  
AND FORCED PSYCHIATRIC 
DRUGGING IN THE TRIAL  
COURTS: RIGHTS VIOLATIONS  
AS A MATTER OF COURSE 
JAMES B. (JIM) GOTTSTEIN*

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted
(C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.