he additional diagnostic label of anosognosia, are effectively de-voiced; and are denied any choice. The patient's perspective is not considered at all, nor are the direct detrimental effects of the drugs, or the detrimental effects of a professional's lack of respect, positive regard, and lack of compassion for the person to whom they are treating.
of a psychiatric diagnosis. It is attached to the psychiatric diagnostic label; it begins when a diagnosis is bestowed as a life sentence: you have a disease with no cure, you just don't know it because you lack insight. Psychiatry has been using it for well over a hundred years: e.g. you have a disease or defect that requires medical treatment with neurotoxic drugs, and electrical shocks, have only replaced psycho-surgery, insulin comas, ice-water baths. The thing is, the claim has, intentionally or not, always serves to justify treating people as less than fully human, or worthy of ordinary civility, respect, and human compassion; and it still does.
It is within the biomedical model the idea that the people who are given a diagnostic label are less than fully human, and don't need their rights protected.
Psychiatry fails to hold members to any ethical, moral or legal standards, in research, education, and direct clinical care. APA members inexplicably cling to the delusion that because psychiatry is a 'medical' profession, everything that is done in Standard Practice is actually ethical and necessary to 'medical treatment.' The fatal outcomes and the traumatized and disabled survivors are evidence that this is not in fact the case.
It is the only option I have. He is my son. I love him.
Parents who objected to medical treatment they would see as at best ill informed and at worst impaired themselves." This is why psychiatrists have felt themselves justified and have purposely mislead, and outright lied to everybody. A belief that anyone who doesn't recognize their superior brains and apparently their psychic abilities; is either simply 'misinformed' or IMPAIRED. This quote is from a psychiatrist who is a 'Human Rights activist.'If psychiatry is no longer practicing eugenics; and a diagnosis of 'mental illness' is just like any other illness, because the people who are diagnosed are not genetically inferior; and psychiatry is practicing medicine; why is psychiatry still using the same 'standard practices' developed when psychiaty was practicing medicine by implementing eugenics as a Standard of Care? Just as importantly, why are subterfuge, academic fraud, financial corruption, illegal marketing, and court orders necessary; but Informed Consent for 'treatment' is NOT required, and barely paid lip service? I do have a biased, but I believe understandable view. It is based on the ten psychiatrists who all misinformed, and all of them apparently had no ethical qualms about the harm done by their ethical, diagnostic and treatment failure...
How is the modern biomedical model of psychiatric practice different from what the Germans did in the 30s and 40s? I see no difference myself. I know I have to this day, never been respected by any of the psychiatrists who have harmed my son, and would not allow me to protect my own child. I will not stop trying to help my son recover, or stop protecting him as best I can from an under-recognized pathology.
I call it pathological psychic psychiatry psychosis. A diagnosis that is characterized by delusions and grandiosity particularly, a belief in one's superior intellect, and one's innate ability to determine what another person can tolerate in terms of physical and psychic trauma. People with this diagnosis are emotionally capaple sociopaths, with an ability to commit crimes without guilt and use of coercion, seclusion, chemical lobotomies, and give Electrical Shocks to gain behavioral compliance. These crimes committed by psychiatrists with pathological psychic psychiatry psychosis, are medically necessary. The people who have pathological psychic psychiatry psychosis can diagnose a disease in anyone's brain by simply looking at them and talking to people who are unhappy about the patient's behavior...Is that a skill or what! To be able to pull a disease out of a collection of subjective observations, like a magician pulls a rabbit from a hat, that is mighty handy! I wonder if these psychiatrists demand respect bucause their diagnosis of pathological psychic psychiatry psychosis, allows them to know there is no way in hell they can earn it.
If Mental Illness is Like Any Other Why Don't We Court Order Exercise?' on July 19, 2011
picture found at mentalhealthstigma.com